Dappered

Affordable Men's Style

  • Don’t Miss Anything
  • Start Here
  • Essentials Shop
  • Latest Deals
  • Style Scenarios
  • Reviews
  • Forum

Style Poll: UNIQLO to buy J. Crew?

March 3, 2014 By Joe | Heads up: Buying via our links may result in us getting a commission. Also, we take your privacy rights seriously. Head here to learn more.

WSJ: UNIQLO Parent Company wants J. Crew

According to the Wall Street Journal, UNIQLO’s parent company and J. Crew are in the very beginnings of talks that could lead to J. Crew selling itself to the Japanese based clothing giant for as much as $5 billion.

Fast Retailing is the name of UNIQLO’s parent company, and the chairman, president, and CEO is Japan’s wealthiest man. He’s also said that he wants Fast Retailing to become the world’s largest clothing retailer, and to do so, goals have been set to quintuple revenue by 2020. That’d push them past Inditex (Zara), H&M, and GAP inc.

Fast Retailing gets a lot of its revenue from Japan (77% as of last year), and if they want to be #1 world wide, that means they have to get huge in other markets. From the side of Fast Retailing/Uniqlo, acquiring J. Crew to expand their reach probably makes sense. But on the consumer side, it could be a bit of a mash-up.

UPDATE: As fey mentions in the comments below, Fast Retailing isn’t a 100% inexpensive clothing company. They own Theory, J. Brand, and have their fingers in a few other higher-quality clothing pies. But UNIQLO appears to the be sales engine.

In the U.S., UNIQLO seems to be seen as a place to go for plain, but usually well executed basics at very low prices. J. Crew has grown into a pushing-the-price-envelope, style risk taking (especially on the women’s side) brand. They’re different enough that as a consumer, it’s awfully easy to wonder if one would start to influence the other after joining forces. And not necessarily in a good way.

Imagine, J. Crew’s blazers get cheaper, but the fabric and construction quality drops… all while the jacket tails (brace yourselves) somehow manage to get even shorter than what the Ludlow offers now.

Yet maybe this potential new union could make a basic button up shirt that retails for less than $65.

Or they could just leave it all the hell alone.

 

Are you For or Against UNIQLO's Parent Company buying J. Crew?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Uniqlo Tag

Filed Under: Accessories, Clothing, Etc., Uncategorized Tagged With: J. Crew, News, style poll, Uniqlo

Continue the Conversation …

Want to share your thoughts on this article? Send us a tweet, join the discussion on Facebook, or start a discussion on Dappered Threads, our forum!

Don’t Miss Anything

Subscribe via email to get articles in your inbox or add Dappered on Flipboard. You can also follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. Or subscribe to push notifications to get alerts immediately.

New Here?

Well, welcome to Dappered. Here are what we consider the most useful posts on the site if you're looking to put a little more effort into your appearance. Just want to see our favorite menswear products? Shop our essentials here.

The Best in Affordable Style from the Month that Was – March 2021

The Best in Affordable Style from the Month that Was – March 2021

The best sales, new arrivals, and marriable hoodies (the math checks out) from March.

In Review: The Timex Marlin Automatic California Dial

In Review: The Timex Marlin Automatic California Dial

California, knows how to party. But would this watch be invited to your wrist candy soiree?

Steal Alert: J. Crew Extra 50% off Sale Items Blowout (but VERY limited stock)

Steal Alert: J. Crew Extra 50% off Sale Items Blowout (but VERY limited stock)

That sportcoat? $35. But don’t get your hopes up for this sale.

Follow Dappered on Instagram »

Comments

  1. Kevin says

    March 3, 2014 at 5:14 AM

    I bet it stays the same.

  2. Alan says

    March 3, 2014 at 6:36 AM

    I’m fine as long as they don’t skimp on quality. But I’ll believe it when I see it.

  3. fattsmann says

    March 3, 2014 at 7:00 AM

    I bet it stays the same or they learn from each other. How to achieve high quality through a network of manufacturing efficiencies.

  4. zaphod beeblebrox says

    March 3, 2014 at 7:08 AM

    Why J. Crew would be a good buy for Uniqlo:

    1. Uniqlo is trying to break into higher end clothing and be seen as more than just a shop for socks and t-shirts, J. Crew can help them do that.

    2. Uniqlo wants a larger market share in the US

    3. Uniqlo has several Billion in cash lying around and investors are getting antsy (seriously)

    Why J. Crew is not a good buy for Uniqlo:

    1. The brand culture and styles are very different.

    2. in 2012, J. Crew had a huge jump in net income and earnings, thus relative to two years ago, J. Crew is expensive. Granted, their income has been falling since then.

    3. Some of J. Crews draw is that you can buy things there that are made in the USA and sold by an American company, once they are owned by a Japanese brand, this appeal may be lost on new company as costs-cutting takes hold.

    Good for us (consumer)
    Maybe cheaper clothes

    Bad for us (Consumer)
    J. Crew has (more recently) positioned itself as a gap brand (forgive the pun) between retailers like Banana Republic and designers stores like Barney’s. It has done this both by raising its prices, as well as partnering with premium clothing makers to sell their products in J. Crew Stores. As far as I can tell, this has been a good partnership for both members, Uniqlo will probably not maintain these partnerships, with J. Crew pushing the companies to make more contemporary clothing and the designers gaining access to a larger market. Uniqlo will probably not continue these partnerships.

  5. Adam says

    March 3, 2014 at 7:32 AM

    Probably will be a “wholly-owned subsidiary” scenario, allowing JCrew to do it’s own thing.

  6. sojo2600 says

    March 3, 2014 at 8:05 AM

    Against it, but for a different reason. Competition in the marketplace is usually better for the consumer. If we end up with some ultra-brand like Tadashi Yanai wants to build, it will be like Anheuser-Busch InBev in the beer world or Luxottica with sunglasses. The former controls over 50% of US market share and the former basically vertically owns the sunglasses market to the point where markups are huge and its hard not to purchase sunglasses from them. If you have never heard of Luxottica, its for a reason. They keep a low profile for their parent brand because they like to provide consumers the illusion of choice.

  7. BenR says

    March 3, 2014 at 8:05 AM

    Honestly, I’m not sure a change in corporate ownership will result in any noticeable differences from the consumer’s standpoint. J.Crew has got a pretty good thing going and I doubt Uniqlo wants to mess with that much.

  8. sojo2600 says

    March 3, 2014 at 8:34 AM

    I understood this, but voted against it for a different reason than the poll stated. There were only two options, and knowing about Fast Retailing’s other businesses does not make me “for” the acquisition.

  9. Joe says

    March 3, 2014 at 8:57 AM

    Amazon Zappos style? I think there’s a good chance of that. But if they’re pushing, hard, to quintuple revenues, there may be tweaking?

  10. Joe says

    March 3, 2014 at 9:01 AM

    Help me out here then, because I gotta be missing something. The chart,
    https://dappered.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/UNIQLO-breakdown.jpg
    from over here: http://www.fastretailing.com/eng/ir/financial/summary.html sure seems to indicate that the UNIQLO side accounts for the lionshare of revenue?

  11. Justin R.T. says

    March 3, 2014 at 9:01 AM

    I don’t want to support a company whose main goal is stated to simply become “the largest retailer in the world.”

  12. Derric says

    March 3, 2014 at 9:07 AM

    This is where I’m at too. Voted “All for it” but it’s more “Wait and see” for me.

  13. Mark C says

    March 3, 2014 at 9:07 AM

    100%

  14. tomservo says

    March 3, 2014 at 9:09 AM

    I think you’re both right. Uniqlo is the vast majority of their revenue (look at the jump in their international business. That’s what opening up in the US will do for you) But their other global brands are higher end, what that means for J Crew remains to be seen. People are making a lot of good points for both sides.

  15. Joe says

    March 3, 2014 at 9:15 AM

    Yeah, updated the post above. But J. Crew seems to be a slightly different animal. Maybe that’s just the clouded perspective on this end, or, perhaps that’s precisely what Fast Retailing is looking for. A tweener (in terms of price/quality) line. Something that’s accessible but still feels/looks like a step above. Yet not super high end. As zaphod (below) calls it, a “gap” brand.

  16. fey says

    March 3, 2014 at 9:20 AM

    i can’t argue with how successful uniqlo is for them. i was just pointing out that they do currently maintain high end brands.

  17. Joe says

    March 3, 2014 at 9:28 AM

    And totally worth pointing out. Thanks for that. Added it to the post above. But Ford once owned Jaguar. Yet Tata now owns them, and the F-Type looks pretty sweet.

  18. Matthew Nichols says

    March 3, 2014 at 9:42 AM

    Uniqlo will be their Old Navy and J. Crew will be their Banana Republic. Moving to Uniqlo’s model/style would totally destroy the following and brand image that they have built up over the past following years. Remember, J. Crew has been around a long time… they have not been a leader in fashion up until ‘recently’ in terms of brand heritage and they’ve worked hard to establish that. They are the affordable gateway into high end (which is why you see J. Crew pieces at Mr Porter and such). There is a reason people salivate over vintage Banana Republic catalogs and not vintage J. Crew ones. Banana Republic did move away from its roots after Gap bought them, and time went on, but I think that had more to do with the market dictating style and they kept their comparable ‘affordable high-end’ style.

  19. Quancho says

    March 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM

    I lived through the purchase of Brooks Bros. by the clueless Marks & Sparks louts. Never Again!

  20. Adam says

    March 3, 2014 at 10:39 AM

    Oh, there will certainly be some tweaking. Working for a “wholly-owned subsidiary” company that was recently purchased, it definitely can have benefits all around. Supply chains get linked, and material/shipping costs come down when you buy in bulk. So long as you don’t interrupt positive sales growth, there *shouldn’t* be a down side.

  21. Adam says

    March 3, 2014 at 10:44 AM

    Ford also owned Aston Martin and Land Rover at the time, and those were absolute shit boxes.

    Jaguar, Aston Martin, and Land Rover have all since prospered away from the pre-2008 Ford umbrella.

  22. Adam says

    March 3, 2014 at 10:47 AM

    Exactly what I was thinking – J crew will be their “Banana”, while Uniqlo will remain on the cheaper side.

  23. Sigtweed & Corduroy says

    March 3, 2014 at 11:19 AM

    Great post. Unfortunately I think this is where we are headed.

  24. Sigtweed & Corduroy says

    March 3, 2014 at 11:22 AM

    Agree with this. he’s still got good lieutenants in there though, Jenna Lyons, Frank Muytjens, etc.

  25. David says

    March 3, 2014 at 11:32 AM

    Tata Motors, a company that produces the cheapest cars in the world, purchased Jaguar and Land Rover a few years ago, and the result was NOT a lower quality product. Perhaps the same idea applies here.

  26. Invictus says

    March 3, 2014 at 12:14 PM

    That’s because Ford didn’t just set the bar low, they took it off and threw it away.

  27. Joe says

    March 3, 2014 at 1:49 PM

    Yep, that’s what I was getting at.

  28. pierrot says

    March 3, 2014 at 3:27 PM

    Yet they still don’t have an LA store 🙁

  29. Capri says

    March 3, 2014 at 9:46 PM

    Dang, still thought all of those were owned by Ford… that explains alot.

  30. theYeti says

    March 4, 2014 at 6:41 AM

    Just don’t let Uniqlo’s web design team anywhere near Jcrew, please.

  31. Marc says

    March 4, 2014 at 7:02 PM

    Don’t forget Volvo.

  32. Siepi says

    March 5, 2014 at 10:32 AM

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/101466668

  33. Chris Shorter says

    March 18, 2014 at 4:55 PM

    Not so fast: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304747404579447633540074064?mod=djemTEW_h&mg=reno64-wsj

Men’s Fashion or Affordable Style?

Men's Fashion or Affordable Style?

Fashion is temporary and expensive. Style is timeless and affordable. Dappered® helps you work the retail system so that you can be comfortable, look sharp, and save money.

Want to share a great product? Email Us.
Continue the discussion at Dappered Threads.
For a fit perspective, see Joe's measurements.
Make sure to read our affiliate disclosure.

Connect with Dappered

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Most Popular on Dappered

  • 50% off Popular BR Pants & Shoes Sale, Rancourt Savings, & More – The Thurs. Men’s Sales Handful
  • Goodfellow Spring 2021 Roundup Header In Review: Target’s Goodfellow & Co. Spring/Summer 2021 Roundup
  • Monday Men’s Sales Tripod – $225 Super 120s wool Tuxes, New Shoes, & More
  • Steal Alert: J. Crew Extra 50% off Sale Items Blowout (but VERY limited stock)
  • The Weekend Reset: Beans, Post-Rock, and Cool Shoes
  • Spring Temptation: New Affordable Men’s Style Arrivals for 2021

Popular Topics

  • Best dress shirts to own
  • Best looking watches under $100
  • Best men’s dress shoes under $200
  • Nike Killshot sneaker alternatives
  • How to wear a suit without a tie
  • Suitsupply store review
  • Suitsupply Blue Line review
  • J. Crew Factory Thompson suit review
  • How much does it cost to tailor a suit?
  • Dopp kit essentials
  • Brown shoes with gray pants
  • Men’s style buying guide

RSS Latest on Dappered Threads

  • Tuxedo
  • How do you dress when doing yard work?
  • Looking for Military/Field Shirt
  • Replacement Laces
  • Looking for nice brown shoes to match my wedding suit

Copyright © 2021 Dappered.com | Dappered, LLC | Dappered® is a registered trademark of Dappered, LLC

Hat tip: Magazine Pro Theme On Genesis Framework

Dappered does not collect or sell its users personal information | Disclosures: Privacy and Affiliates, Gilt.com, FTC

WPE

We work with partners that use cookies to understand how visitors use our site. Find out more.