Dappered

Affordable Men's Style

  • Don’t Miss Anything
  • Start Here
  • Essentials Shop
  • Latest Deals
  • Style Scenarios
  • Reviews
  • Forum

Style Debate: How short is too short for a blazer?

July 20, 2011 By Joe | Heads up: Buying via our links may result in us getting a commission. Also, we take your privacy rights seriously. Head here to learn more.

Calvin Klein BODY Topstitched Plaid Blazer – $63.74 (reg. $169.95)

Part of the Calvin Klein Extra 25% off clearance FINAL Sale, meaning, no returns and no exchanges.

Maybe the model has really gangly arms.  Maybe he’s got the torso of a praying mantis so his jeans sit lower.  Maybe it’s his one o’clock lean.  Whatever it is, doesn’t this guy’s blazer appear to be getting a little close to too short?

Billowing is bad.  Fitted is good.  But should the trimness of your X axis also apply to your Y?  The old trusted method of ensuring your jacket is neither too long or too short is pictured below.  Let your arms hang relaxed at your sides.  Curl your fingers up like you were going to grasp the handles on a wheelbarrow.  If your jacket comes to rest in the valley of your fingers without bunching up, you’re golden.  If it’s an inch or two above, it’s too short.

It could be his posture in the first pic.  Take a look at the shot taken from the back.  He’s standing straight up there, and it doesn’t look half bad.  On sale for more than $100 off, all cotton, trim CK “Body” fit, and a nice glen plaid pattern.  Very subtle peak lapels too.  Could be a great find if it doesn’t make you look like a Topman Model.

How do you like your jackets?  A little on the short side?  Longer than most?  Leave it all in the comments below…

The tried and true method.  Cotton Sports Jacket by GAP – $68.60 w/code GAP30.  Full review here.

Filed Under: Clothing Tagged With: Blazer, blazer drop, blazer length, Calvin Klein, Gap

Continue the Conversation …

Want to share your thoughts on this article? Send us a tweet, join the discussion on Facebook, or start a discussion on Dappered Threads, our forum!

Don’t Miss Anything

Subscribe via email to get articles in your inbox or add Dappered on Flipboard. You can also follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. Or subscribe to push notifications to get alerts immediately.

New Here?

Well, welcome to Dappered. Here are what we consider the most useful posts on the site if you're looking to put a little more effort into your appearance. Just want to see our favorite menswear products? Shop our essentials here.

The Weekend Reset: Football, Demons, and Cake

The Weekend Reset: Football, Demons, and Cake

Plus: Assassins

Steal Alert: All White Stan Smiths for $38.40 shipped

Steal Alert: All White Stan Smiths for $38.40 shipped

Regular price is $80. Normal sale price can hover around $60. But now under $40?

Extra 60% off BR’s Solid Sale Section, 45% off the Timex Marlin, & More – The Thurs. Men’s Sales Handful

Extra 60% off BR’s Solid Sale Section, 45% off the Timex Marlin, & More – The Thurs. Men’s Sales Handful

Plus luxury dress shirts with a hidden button down collar.

Follow Dappered on Instagram »

Comments

  1. Anonymous says

    July 20, 2011 at 9:50 AM

    Looks a tad short, but not as bad as some offenders (Topman: case in point). For that price though, it’d be an easy to excuse an inch or two of shortness.

  2. Danny Maurer says

    July 20, 2011 at 10:04 AM

    For suit jackets and anything I plan to wear primarily with slacks, I always go with the finger curling rule. Anything shorter just doesn’t look professional. 

    However, for casual blazers sometimes I will go a little shorter. I will only go with a slightly shorter length if I intend to only wear it with jeans/colored chinos. My limit is the the blazer reaching the end of the wrists/start of the palms. 

  3. vizzle says

    July 20, 2011 at 10:18 AM

    I think SLIGHTLY shorter than the hand rule is now fashionable. And a bit too short looks better than too long. But I think this is overdoing it.

  4. Anonymous says

    July 20, 2011 at 10:54 AM

    I like the blazer to cover my butt. Too short is when it’s not covering *most* of my butt. IMO, this model looks to have long arms; I think if it satisfied the finger rule, the blazer would be too long on him. Just look how long it’d be relative to his pockets from the back view.

    That said, this one’s too short. I’ll always take too short over too long though.

  5. Scott says

    July 20, 2011 at 11:50 AM

    “fashion” has for several years done the shrinking suit look. Pants with flood hems and short jackets have been quite the rage. I have noticed that the trend has dyed down a bit, but GQ still throws around the look. The one above actually looks pretty sporty and useable vs some of the borrowed my little brother’s suit look 

  6. Anotherjames says

    July 20, 2011 at 11:56 AM

    I’ve never gone by a wheelbarrow rule especially because each man’s arm length varies. My understanding is that jackets are to be long enough to just cover your posterior when standing up straight. Again, difficult to perfect with iff the rack bc each man’s build varies. This also gets complicated when jeans, typically low rise, are worn which tend to hang lower than a man’s rear, or sag, This can cause the jacket to appear too short even though it’s actually fitted properly.

  7. Joe G. says

    July 20, 2011 at 12:24 PM

    My understanding is the bottom of the blazer should (literally) cover your butt. So using that fairly cut and dry rule, it does seem a bit on the short side.

    I don’t think it looks bad though, but my father who takes a fairly conservative approach to suiting might think it looks ridiculous. Fashion seems to be dictating a generally tighter, slimmer look and the model appears to be in line with that.

    FWIW, I think the blazer is gorgeous and I would wear it in a heartbeat, especially given the price. How can a tailor come into play here? I doubt they can make a jacket any longer, but is it feasible to go a size up (say from a R to an L) and then have them shorten it?

  8. Joe G. says

    July 20, 2011 at 12:24 PM

    My understanding is the bottom of the blazer should (literally) cover your butt. So using that fairly cut and dry rule, it does seem a bit on the short side.

    I don’t think it looks bad though, but my father who takes a fairly conservative approach to suiting might think it looks ridiculous. Fashion seems to be dictating a generally tighter, slimmer look and the model appears to be in line with that.

    FWIW, I think the blazer is gorgeous and I would wear it in a heartbeat, especially given the price. How can a tailor come into play here? I doubt they can make a jacket any longer, but is it feasible to go a size up (say from a R to an L) and then have them shorten it?

  9. BKA says

    July 20, 2011 at 12:25 PM

    Looks a bit short to me, but maybe only because of the color/pattern.  If it were darker and looked less like a suit jacket missing its pants I would say it’s fine for the jeans look or maybe slim, non-creased khakis.  As a short guy (5’7″) I like having less jacket and more pants, but I try and stick to the wheelbarrow method for suit jackets and especially for blazers.

  10. branxini says

    July 20, 2011 at 1:02 PM

    Using your hands as a benchmark is misleading, since there is wide variation in the length of people’s length. I have somewhat shorter arms, and if I go by the knuckles rule, my blazers would be somewhat short. Not ridiculously short, but short. The best rule is simply to make sure the blazer covers the curvature of the butt, +/- an inch or so.

  11. Patch says

    July 20, 2011 at 1:04 PM

    Not as bad as this one, which is definitely too short: http://www.calvinklein.com/product/index.jsp?productId=10832627&clickid=prod_cs

  12. vinman says

    July 20, 2011 at 3:41 PM

    I agree with others that using your hands as a guide can be misleading if you have unusually long or short arms. I prefer the “cover your butt” guideline, especially when it comes to suits worn to work. For sport jackets worn casually you can go a little shorter, but NOT like the Topman model who looks ridiculous. A jacket that doesn’t cover all or most of your rump looks weird-like when women wear leggings as pants. 

  13. branxini says

    July 20, 2011 at 3:56 PM

    Another thing to consider is how fitted is the jacket/blazer. A close fitting coat can be on the longer side and still look quite okay, while baggy and long will definitely look bad.
    On the picture above, the length of the coat is almost at the level of the sleeve length. That’s another indication it is too short, and it really throws off the balance of the coat. I would think that it needs to extend at lest until the base of the mode’s thumb to have semblance of classic proportion (while still plenty short to be considered sporty or whatever).The second picture is about right, but borderline – i don’t think it should go even a milimeter shorter..Finally, some tailors use formulas, which is an approach I personally am skeptical about, but they give close enough results; one of them is your height in inches, divided by two, minus four.

  14. branxini says

    July 20, 2011 at 4:04 PM

    This is ridiculous, although they got one thing rigth: a short coat should probably be one buttoned as a rule

  15. Greg says

    July 20, 2011 at 4:05 PM

    I would honestly not notice it if it wasn’t pointed out to me.  I think I notice color scheme, arm length, and matching more than small things such as that. 

  16. Anonymous says

    July 20, 2011 at 4:23 PM

    I think it’s all about proportion to your own body.  Personally, I like mine a taste shorter than the “finger curl” method.

  17. David Gunn says

    July 20, 2011 at 6:47 PM

    I’m a short guy with a long torso and even shorter legs (5’4” with a 28″ inseam). for me, the “cover your butt” rule tends to make my legs look even shorter than they are. I’d wear a jacket like this in a heartbeat.

  18. Stellygrande says

    July 20, 2011 at 8:50 PM

    I saw a dude selling suits with this tight/short cut jacket…he turned around and had a small rip on the arm hole seam.  This is the reason the shrinking suit is dumb.  Nothing beats a good ol’ fashioned well fitted suit with room to drape.  If I see a guy with a short jacket and with a super tight fit — I’m 90% sure he lives with his mom.    

  19. destroyideas says

    July 20, 2011 at 10:09 PM

    When we’re talking about casual sport coats and blazers, I think shorter is fine. It doesn’t work well on a suit jacket, but when you’re wearing a jacket with jeans, I think you’ve already breaking some sort of rule, so you might as well go shorter. Plus, the regular length ones look  weird when you’re wearing skinny jeans.

  20. zerostyle says

    July 21, 2011 at 2:06 PM

    I find that jackets are really inconsistent with their length.

    For me, the “proper” length of hitting just where your fingers curl results in a jacket that covers around 2/3 of my body. (I must have a short torso or something).

    I think the trick is to just make sure the end of your jacket roughly splits your body in half.

  21. Melon says

    July 21, 2011 at 2:30 PM

    In five years, photos of these short jackets will look as bad as ruffled tuxedo shirt fronts from 1970’s proms.

  22. Balkan says

    July 22, 2011 at 1:18 AM

    Maybe so, but the Beatles on Ed Sullivan have always looked pretty fierce to me, and they’re rocking suit jackets this short.

  23. Lorenz says

    July 24, 2011 at 9:25 PM

    Clearly too short in my opinion… I don’t like how jackets are getting shorter and shorter, it just doesn’t look cool.

  24. Eric says

    August 11, 2012 at 1:21 AM

    I adhere to the finger curl method, plus I like how the jacket length draws a not-too-obvious eye to my junk. Not too short there.

Men’s Fashion or Affordable Style?

Men's Fashion or Affordable Style?

Fashion is temporary and expensive. Style is timeless and affordable. Dappered® helps you work the retail system so that you can be comfortable, look sharp, and save money.

Want to share a great product? Email Us.
Continue the discussion at Dappered Threads.
For a fit perspective, see Joe's measurements.
Make sure to read our affiliate disclosure.

Connect with Dappered

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Most Popular on Dappered

  • TUESDAY Men’s Sales Tripod – Bronze Watches, Allen Edmonds Sneakers, & More
  • Extra 60% off BR’s Solid Sale Section, 45% off the Timex Marlin, & More – The Thurs. Men’s Sales Handful
  • 10 Best Bets for $75 or Less – Shawl Collar Sweaters, Nerd Whimsy Art, & More
  • Steal Alert: Nordstrom Extra 25% off Sale Items Clearance Blowout
  • What I Wore Today Working from Home: Brandon, Trial Attorney
  • On Martin Luther King Jr. Day

Popular Topics

  • Best dress shirts to own
  • Best looking watches under $100
  • Best men’s dress shoes under $200
  • Nike Killshot sneaker alternatives
  • How to wear a suit without a tie
  • Suitsupply store review
  • Suitsupply Blue Line review
  • J. Crew Factory Thompson suit review
  • How much does it cost to tailor a suit?
  • Dopp kit essentials
  • Brown shoes with gray pants
  • Men’s style buying guide

RSS Latest on Dappered Threads

  • after 11 years, finally bought those chukkas from the dappered front page :-D
  • Recommendations on American Made Denim (for my Wife)
  • AE Dalton too stiff
  • SuitSupply Linen Tuxedo
  • hiking shoes for AE dress shoe dress boot guy.

Copyright © 2021 Dappered.com | Dappered, LLC | Dappered® is a registered trademark of Dappered, LLC

Hat tip: Magazine Pro Theme On Genesis Framework

Dappered does not collect or sell its users personal information | Disclosures: Privacy and Affiliates, Gilt.com, FTC

WPE

We work with partners that use cookies to understand how visitors use our site. Find out more.