Dappered

Affordable Men's Style

  • Don’t Miss Anything
  • Start Here
  • Essentials Shop
  • Latest Deals
  • Style Scenarios
  • Reviews
  • Forum

In Review: The Skagen Square Dial “Strand” Watch

August 26, 2014 By Joe | Heads up: Buying via our links may result in us getting a commission. Also, we take your privacy rights seriously. Head here to learn more.

Skagen “Strand” Square Watch – $135.00

“Round round get a-round I get a-round yeah”

– The Beach Boys

And so does everyone else when it comes to affordable watches. There just aren’t a lot of other dial options being made for the sub $200 watch market. Square, rectangular, cushion case… forget it. 95% of those that are being made with a different case shape are beyond gaudy. “Oh, you want a watch that’s got something other than a round case? LET’S GET NUTS!“

So applause for Skagen, who recently released this square dial option dripping with… nothing. Just their modern, understated design.

A review of the Skagen "Strand" on Dappered.com

Very suit worthy, and doesn’t look cheap when dressed up.

It’d be hard to call a Skagen design “classic”, but combine the Danish minimalism with a square face & slim trapezoidal case, and you end up with something that has an art-deco look to it.

Completely suit worthy. The blue tipped seconds hand is a nice touch. There’s no texture to the dial, other than the fact that the outer ring square is slightly elevated above the central field.

Construction specs aren’t real impressive. Japanese Quart, mineral crystal, and a measly 30m in water resistance. But it is super lightweight. So for those who don’t like having some cinder-block strapped to their wrist all day, it’s got that classic Skagen feather-feel. The “genuine leather” band is also par for Skagen’s course. Really light weight. Still soft and flexible. Just not something wildly nice.

The Skagen Strand on Dappered.com

No date function, just a super clean dial. Blue tipped second hand is a nice detail.

Don’t be freaked out by the 35 mm case measurement. True, each side measures 35mm, but thanks to geometry it wears larger due to the diagonal (corner to corner) measurement. Bottom line: Squares & Circles… are different, and this thing wears like a watch in the 40-42mm range.

Can’t seem to find these anywhere for less than the full price of $135. Usually once a Skagen model hits Amazon or a discount watch retailer, they’ll get at least some kind of price cut. For now, at least it ships & returns free through Nordstrom for $135.

The slim Skagen "Strand" on Dappered.com

Skagen knows slim.

Filed Under: Reviews, Watches Tagged With: skagen, square watch

Continue the Conversation …

Want to share your thoughts on this article? Send us a tweet, join the discussion on Facebook, or start a discussion on Dappered Threads, our forum!

Don’t Miss Anything

Subscribe via email to get articles in your inbox or add Dappered on Flipboard. You can also follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. Or subscribe to push notifications to get alerts immediately.

New Here?

Well, welcome to Dappered. Here are what we consider the most useful posts on the site if you're looking to put a little more effort into your appearance. Just want to see our favorite menswear products? Shop our essentials here.

On Martin Luther King Jr. Day

On Martin Luther King Jr. Day

There will be other sales.

Steal Alert: Nordstrom Extra 25% off Sale Items Clearance Blowout

Steal Alert: Nordstrom Extra 25% off Sale Items Clearance Blowout

Uncle Nordy wants this stuff gone. Cashmere sweaters. Lots of chukkas. Plenty of Bonobos.

Best Posts of 2020: Thanks to our Contributors

Best Posts of 2020: Thanks to our Contributors

A thanks to all the guys that help us out.

Follow Dappered on Instagram »

Comments

  1. Ken 2 says

    August 26, 2014 at 9:08 AM

    I’ve had two Skagens and both quit on me after about three years. They stopped keeping accurate time. Also, the bands on my particular models started to look pretty tore up after a year…and they could only be replaced by Skagen due to the unique size. The watches look great, but beware, they may not be the highest quality.

  2. Joe says

    August 26, 2014 at 9:10 AM

    I don’t think that’s the biggest surprise. Skagen doesn’t make a super expensive watch by any stretch. But 3 years, and just dead doesn’t sound great. Battery replacement, sure, but not d-e-a-d dead.

  3. Steven Bremer says

    August 26, 2014 at 9:13 AM

    This is a perfect argument for spending a bit more on quality. My 40 year old Omega runs like a top.

  4. random-adam says

    August 26, 2014 at 9:26 AM

    It looks really good, but Skagen quality gives me pause. Pretty sure my next dress watch will be this Seiko Solar: http://www.amazon.com/dp/B008X6JJNC

  5. BenR says

    August 26, 2014 at 9:43 AM

    I like the design on this a lot. It’s got a real Nomos-meets-Junghans-Max-Bill vibe going on. I guess I’m a snob, though, because I’m not sure I could bring myself to wear a Skagen again. I’ve owned a couple before… good-looking, but not real impressive in terms of overall quality (as noted in this review).

    Design-wise, I’d love to see the second hand removed or maybe replaced by a small seconds dial to make the quartz tick-tock a bit more subtle.

  6. Joe says

    August 26, 2014 at 9:55 AM

    One day, when the lottery is won: http://www.nomos-store.com/en/Watches/Model-series/Tetra/Watches-with-manual-winding/Tetra-sapphire-crystal-back.html

    $2320 though. I mean. Cripes.

  7. Mark Johnson says

    August 26, 2014 at 10:49 AM

    Could be the battery replacements that killed them. That’s happened to me before despite always taking watches to jewelers to have the battery changed. Those guys supposedly know what they’re doing but I’ve had a watch quit soon after battery replacement often enough that I don’t think it’s entirely coincidental.

  8. A.J. says

    August 26, 2014 at 11:16 AM

    Thanks for the review Joe – love seeing watches on this site

    Just FYI: looks like there’s a rogue “v” in the post’s title

  9. BenR says

    August 26, 2014 at 11:24 AM

    Oddly enough I like the design of the Skagen better – I prefer the Arabic numerals and the rounded case shape.

  10. Joe says

    August 26, 2014 at 11:28 AM

    Heh. Derp. Thanks AJ. Fixed.

  11. Brendan says

    August 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM

    That’s a bummer you had a bad experience with them. Just to offer up an alternate experience – I got my first Skagen 8 years ago and it’s still running as good as ever. I did have to replace the band after a few years (and I’m due to replace it again…), but that was a pretty painless process and if I remember correctly it only cost around $10-15.

    I have a second one that I got 3 or 4 years ago which is also running fine, and the strap isn’t showing any signs of needing a replacement yet. All in all, I’ve been really happy with Skagen. (and I get compliments on both of mine all the time, but I know nobody’s disputing the looks here)

  12. Winston Heard says

    August 26, 2014 at 2:04 PM

    i own this one. aside from the stiff-ish band (which i want to switch anyway) i really like it.

  13. random-adam says

    August 26, 2014 at 2:21 PM

    Thanks for the report! It’s very tempting for the price.

    One of the things keeping me back from buying it is that I’d immediately want to splurge on a black shell watchband from FFF, at almost the entire cost of the watch. 🙁

  14. Clawbrant says

    August 26, 2014 at 2:33 PM

    “A measly 30m in water resistance”

    I don’t know, I’m frequently dropping my dress watches in 100 feet of water. I wouldn’t want to go down and fish it out just to find that it somehow stopped working!

  15. Joe says

    August 26, 2014 at 2:42 PM

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_Resistant_mark

    30m = “splash/rain RESISTANT”

    Not proof, resistant.

    So, be careful. That’s all that’s being said.

  16. Philip Qualls says

    August 26, 2014 at 2:55 PM

    I’m with Brendan. I’ve had mine for about eight years and it’s still accurate. It looks worn, but not terrible and still get compliments on it. Of course, I got the metal band and that might play a role in the durability. But even after 3 years, the economics of the watch are pretty good: 135/3 = $45 a year compared to an Omega at 40 years $2000 (which is conservative)/40 = $50 a year.

  17. bryclops says

    August 26, 2014 at 3:05 PM

    I’m prejudiced against Stuhrling Original for their ridiculous MSRP games (I’m prejudiced against Invicta for the same reason), so I don’t really ever give them a chance. There’s no way anyone has ever paid the MSRP, because the watches just aren’t that nice.

    That being said, that’s not a bad looking set of Navitimer homages, but don’t expect quality above what you’re actually paying. I’d prefer to go with the Rotary Navi homage (what’s it called again, the Chronospeed or some such?), if it were me.

  18. Ken 2 says

    August 26, 2014 at 3:40 PM

    I certainly wish they’d worked out. They are sharp looking watches. I’ll still wear one once in a while… even with the time way off.

  19. pierrot says

    August 26, 2014 at 4:13 PM

    not sold on the square but still much more tasteful than that Bulova from yesterday

  20. Loscv29 says

    August 27, 2014 at 8:55 AM

    Sure, Skagen isn’t known for their quality… but Hot Damn do they have some sexy minimal design. For about $100… I’d do this watch all day.

  21. Invictus says

    August 27, 2014 at 1:40 PM

    Be prejudiced against Invicta because they suck, not just because of price games. Their blatant ripoff of other designs is just a shitty move, and not iconic looks like the Submariner or Oyster, either. Their original designs are garbage, too. I had someone buy a Corduba Chrono for me; all metal case, 26mm PVD link band. It weighed over a pound. As if that wasn’t bad enough, one of the hands on the chrono is swinging freely around inside the case.

  22. southy says

    August 28, 2014 at 9:31 AM

    Really solid look. Not so sure I like the blue-tipped second hand though, kind of disappears to the eye and/or unbalances the clean minimalism of the rest of it. Maybe it’s one of those quirks that you grow to love.

Men’s Fashion or Affordable Style?

Men's Fashion or Affordable Style?

Fashion is temporary and expensive. Style is timeless and affordable. Dappered® helps you work the retail system so that you can be comfortable, look sharp, and save money.

Want to share a great product? Email Us.
Continue the discussion at Dappered Threads.
For a fit perspective, see Joe's measurements.
Make sure to read our affiliate disclosure.

Connect with Dappered

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Most Popular on Dappered

  • Steal Alert: Nordstrom Extra 25% off Sale Items Clearance Blowout
  • adidas End of Season, Allen Edmonds Warehouse Sale, & More – The Thurs. Men’s Sales Handful
  • Best Posts of 2020: A lot of watches, some shoes, and being a stylish dad
  • Steal Alert: 97% Wool / 3% Spandex Dress Pants from The Tie Bar for $25
  • Best Posts of 2020: Athleisure, Activewear, and Hot Weather
  • On Martin Luther King Jr. Day

Popular Topics

  • Best dress shirts to own
  • Best looking watches under $100
  • Best men’s dress shoes under $200
  • Nike Killshot sneaker alternatives
  • How to wear a suit without a tie
  • Suitsupply store review
  • Suitsupply Blue Line review
  • J. Crew Factory Thompson suit review
  • How much does it cost to tailor a suit?
  • Dopp kit essentials
  • Brown shoes with gray pants
  • Men’s style buying guide

RSS Latest on Dappered Threads

  • Recommendations on American Made Denim (for my Wife)
  • AE Dalton too stiff
  • SuitSupply Linen Tuxedo
  • hiking shoes for AE dress shoe dress boot guy.
  • Blazer aaaand...

Copyright © 2021 Dappered.com | Dappered, LLC | Dappered® is a registered trademark of Dappered, LLC

Hat tip: Magazine Pro Theme On Genesis Framework

Dappered does not collect or sell its users personal information | Disclosures: Privacy and Affiliates, Gilt.com, FTC

WPE

We work with partners that use cookies to understand how visitors use our site. Find out more.