Dappered

Affordable Men's Style

  • Don’t Miss Anything
  • Start Here
  • Essentials Shop
  • Latest Deals
  • Style Scenarios
  • Reviews
  • Forum

What would you pay? The Fossil Townsman Chronograph

May 21, 2014 By Joe | Heads up: Buying via our links may result in us getting a commission. Also, we take your privacy rights seriously. Head here to learn more.

Fossil Townsman Chronograph – $125.00 

NOTE: There are plenty of the Fossil “Townsman” model available on Amazon for less… but not in this blue/cream/orange color scheme. 

UPDATE: Looks like Amazon got these in a few days after the post fired off. $92.99 and fulfilled by Amazon at the time this update.

First, a question: Would you find this watch more appealing if say, it said “Citizen” or even “Timex” on the dial instead of Fossil?

Meanwhile, it’s a real nice feeling watch for the low $100’s. Specs are about what you’d expect for a department store watch in this price range. Mineral crystal, Japanese quartz movement,  and 50 m worth of water resistance.

Fossil Townsman reviewed on Dappered.comYo Fossil (& Timex, & Seiko, & Citizen) make more clean, classic dials like this please…

For the looks, it’s as clean as a Fossil gets. It’s an IWC Portugese homage with hints of 60s & 70s color (like the not quite navy watch band, cream dial, & orange second hand). The chronograph pushers aren’t just forgotten flush buttons, but instead have a piston/mushroom top. The leather for the band is a decent thickness, is plenty pliable, and the rectangular holes for the tang buckle are a nice, subtle detail. It’s a quartz, but still feels decently substantial. It doesn’t suffer from flimsy-quartz-itus.

The orange second hand is in constant movement and not controlled by the chronograph function (seconds are ticked off by the subdial at 12 when the chronograph is activated). There’s no date or day window on this thing, which is either an omission to some, or, a welcome decision that keeps the face extra clean.

Fossil Townsman Chrono on Dappered.comColor scheme isn’t classic, and some might like that.

But… and it shouldn’t necessarily make a difference… the name. “Fossil”, as a brand, can make some great stuff. But it certainly seems to project “youth”, and youth can sometimes (unfairly) project inexperience. Fair? Unfair? Cast a vote and leave it all below.

What would you pay? The Fossil Townsman Chronograph

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

 

A review of Fossil's Townsman on Dappered.com

Filed Under: Watches Tagged With: Fossil, what would you pay

Continue the Conversation …

Want to share your thoughts on this article? Send us a tweet, join the discussion on Facebook, or start a discussion on Dappered Threads, our forum!

Don’t Miss Anything

Subscribe via email to get articles in your inbox or add Dappered on Flipboard. You can also follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. Or subscribe to push notifications to get alerts immediately.

New Here?

Well, welcome to Dappered. Here are what we consider the most useful posts on the site if you're looking to put a little more effort into your appearance. Just want to see our favorite menswear products? Shop our essentials here.

In Review & Win It: The Q Timex 1978 Reissue

In Review & Win It: The Q Timex 1978 Reissue

Lots of class. Classically sized but not tiny. Quiet. Yes. Quiet.

Style Scenario: Chinos Chukkas Polo – Black, gray, and brown

Style Scenario: Chinos Chukkas Polo – Black, gray, and brown

It’s back. Chinos, Chukkas, Polo. Yes, black and brown together. Plus deal stacking retail magic.

10 things a well dressed guy might worry others think about him

10 things a well dressed guy might worry others think about him

Some have unshakable confidence. A lot of us don’t. And that’s okay.

Follow Dappered on Instagram »

Comments

  1. fash1on says

    May 21, 2014 at 5:01 AM

    there’s not a lot of pride of ownership for a fossil brand watch. but it certainly is a handsome piece.

  2. Rt1583 says

    May 21, 2014 at 5:07 AM

    About 14 or so years ago I had quite a few Fossils, back when they cost between $60 and $100, and liked each of them. This one looks like it could be considered to be in their top line models and a $20 increase in their top line range over that many years is reasonable.
    If I needed it (and wanted it) I’d have no qualms paying $120 for it. If I just wanted it I’d have to think about it a little more though.

  3. Tod C says

    May 21, 2014 at 6:06 AM

    If they would drop the secondary dials I would consider it but I like my watches with a clean face

  4. beatle says

    May 21, 2014 at 6:14 AM

    I think Fossil should diversify watches like this into a different, more upscale brand. I can’t see a teenager wearing this watch, but I’d have it on my wrist if not for the name. Sorry, Fossil, it’s true. No hard feelings. I’ll still keep using your wallets.

  5. Bill T says

    May 21, 2014 at 6:47 AM

    You can get a lightly used Orient automatic on eBay or a new Chinese movement sapphire crystal automatic watch (see Parnis watches) for that money.

  6. zaphod beeblebrox says

    May 21, 2014 at 6:54 AM

    I have had exactly two fossil watches (I learn slowly). They both looked really nice. First one just stopped working.
    Second one failed in the shower. That is unacceptable in my mind.
    (now I wear a hamilton khaki chrono auto….much nicer, still failed once, but Hamilton took care of it)

  7. Timothy Fisher says

    May 21, 2014 at 7:01 AM

    Never had an issue with fossil. I had a very nice one for several years that has garnered me plenty of complements. That said I don’t spend 100+ on watches. If I can get a great look at a better price I will go for that.

  8. random-adam says

    May 21, 2014 at 7:05 AM

    Looks fantastic. Don’t care about the branding; it’s tasteful enough. Reservations about the movement (I prefer my quartz to be solar-powered) but for this price I could overlook that. I need something to wear in the summer with navy boat shoes and this would jump to the top of the list…

    Except anything bigger than 42mm just feels too large. Sorry, Fossil.

  9. Dominic says

    May 21, 2014 at 7:32 AM

    I have a fossil and I love this one. I’m not a watch type of guy though.

  10. Officer Rex Bishop says

    May 21, 2014 at 8:00 AM

    I don’t see anything wrong with the Fossil name, it’s not like this is the Wal-Mart Townsman or the New Coke Townsman.

  11. Mark Johnson says

    May 21, 2014 at 8:16 AM

    I like the way it looks, and coldn’t give a damn whether it’s a Fossil or some other brand, but when it comes to quartz movements I’m all in for solar powered versions like the Citizen Eco-drives. Not having to ever replace the battery is really nice, so…if this had a rechargeable solar battery I’d consider it.

  12. Loscv29 says

    May 21, 2014 at 8:16 AM

    Seems kinda vain that so many people outright disqualify it for the logo.

  13. bryclops says

    May 21, 2014 at 8:24 AM

    Agreed. The sort of vintage casual feel makes me with it were more like 40mm. At that size I would have probably already ordered one.

  14. Gerard Brown says

    May 21, 2014 at 8:28 AM

    48MM wide is just a little too big of a face for me. Good design though.

  15. Christian says

    May 21, 2014 at 8:29 AM

    I dig it y’all. This is around the maximum I’d spend for a watch. I would however go the extra money for a Daniel Wellington watch. I LOVE those.

  16. Alex K says

    May 21, 2014 at 8:35 AM

    considering it looks almost identical to my timex easy reader, i’d probably pay no more than $30 for this watch.

  17. Michael says

    May 21, 2014 at 8:45 AM

    That’s a very good-looking chrono. I think my hesitation lies in the quality (e.g. water resistance, movement, band quality, etc…). What Fossil lacks in quality, it makes up in style.

  18. beatle says

    May 21, 2014 at 8:46 AM

    FWIW, my Omega Seamaster, new in 2007, had to go back to Omega twice for repairs. Both failures were fixed under warranty and it has been bulletproof since 2009, but even the Swiss have failures from time to time.
    Heck, my Seiko orange monster has failed twice as well, though the first time was shock trauma from a water skiing fall…
    I just accept occasional failures as the cost of owning automatics.

  19. Jimmy_Johansen says

    May 21, 2014 at 9:02 AM

    I wouldn’t buy it. I have enough watches (I know, I know…. there’s never ENOUGH watches) but I have an ORIS that would look lovely with that band.

  20. Adam says

    May 21, 2014 at 9:04 AM

    I dig it.

  21. Adam says

    May 21, 2014 at 9:04 AM

    Wait, you’ll buy their cheap leather wallets but won’t buy their cheap quartz watch?

  22. Adam says

    May 21, 2014 at 9:05 AM

    Agreed. I had a sweet Fossil titanium chrono in high school.

    I like Fossil – they’re innovative (with style), and make a TON of watches for other high end luxury brands.

  23. Adam says

    May 21, 2014 at 9:07 AM

    This. Pretty sure that’s their whole market strategy though. Style over substance.

  24. David M. says

    May 21, 2014 at 9:10 AM

    To me, having a watch that breaks three times within a two year period in the exact same way (both the second and minute hands becoming disconnected) is not worth owning. Especially given that I never put the watch through any kind of real abuse (never swam or showered with it, banged it against anything, etc.). If a watch can’t do, with any kind of dependability, the one thing it was created to do, it has ceased to be useful to me (no matter how good it looks).

  25. Guest says

    May 21, 2014 at 9:14 AM

    Too big. But I do own a Fossil chrono that I LOVE. Ignore that this is a crappy Google Images result with the date bezel floating in there. Put this thing on a nice colorful NATO and bingo.

  26. Josh says

    May 21, 2014 at 9:16 AM

    I think 48mm is too big. But I have one Fossil chrono that I love. Ignore that this crappy Google Images result has the date window bezel floating inside the face. http://f.cl.ly/items/0U2I3n0Z0w1H1H0X0u2n/$_35.JPG

  27. BYC says

    May 21, 2014 at 9:19 AM

    Looks decent, but with $125 being the low end of Orient watches I would never play close to full price for it.

  28. beatle says

    May 21, 2014 at 9:34 AM

    Yes, it’s called a double standard. Branding on my Fossil wallet is virtually nonexistent, and my last wallet did me well for 8 years. My new one feels even more substantial and looks nice. Wallets just aren’t a luxury item for me. Watches on the other hand… (no pun intended)

  29. Joe says

    May 21, 2014 at 9:47 AM

    You wear your watch into the shower?

  30. Officer Rex Bishop says

    May 21, 2014 at 10:41 AM

    And ultimately, like Shakespeare said, what’s in a name? The whole point of Dappered is looking good for less money, even if the item that “looks good” is from Target or Fossil.

  31. Anthony says

    May 21, 2014 at 11:20 AM

    Good looks, but the brand yells low quality and cheap construction. Until Fossil starts using sapphire crystal, improves water resistance, and implements other finishes expected of quality watch construction, I’m not considering buying their watches. Durability means more to me than the looks.

  32. zaphod beeblebrox says

    May 21, 2014 at 11:37 AM

    I wore watch to beach, got sand all over and showered off before getting in car. Watch never went in ocean, watch had canvas strap.

  33. Bruce says

    May 21, 2014 at 12:17 PM

    It’s a great looking piece. Admittedly there are many great looking, non-gaudy designs from Fossil. Many of which are similar to classic designs from the past, but nonetheless well executed. I’ve got a pilot chrono that is fantastic looking, and I can’t help but wish it were automatic, even if it were a cheaper miyota or even seagull…

  34. Huck says

    May 21, 2014 at 12:24 PM

    I like the style, but I’m not impressed with the quality of the one fossil I own. This would have to be in the $65 range for me to buy it. The blue band is also dealbreker

  35. Kevin says

    May 21, 2014 at 12:37 PM

    I agree. I’m still looking for 2 nice moderately priced (sub $300) plain faced watches. One black for work and one more casual. This would be perfect for the causal watch if it didn’t have the two little dials.

  36. Butch_Zee says

    May 21, 2014 at 1:18 PM

    Very nice watch. I love watches without the day/date/both box. Japanese quartz movement is alright in my book. Would pay (close to) the full price for it. (Can’t pay that much if it’s Chinese/3rd World-assembled though.)

  37. CosmicQuandaries says

    May 21, 2014 at 2:21 PM

    The cut 12 and 6 sort of bug me but other than that it’s nice.

  38. Glenn Canning says

    May 21, 2014 at 6:02 PM

    As Fossils go, this is easily one of the better pieces that I’ve seen. That being said, I’m not too hot on them personally. (Not to say that I’m a watch snob- far from it, they just don’t rock my boat.)

    I really like the color of the band, though, and it’s stitching.

  39. bjs314 says

    May 22, 2014 at 6:38 AM

    There is a major quality difference between a Fossil and either a Citizen or Timex. It’s not just about the name keeping me from buying it, its about the product itself.

    Wearing a Fossil is like wearing Axe bodyspray. If you’re over 25, you’re making an ass of yourself.

  40. jdw says

    May 22, 2014 at 8:26 AM

    I’m not a watch guy, so $90 is the mark for me. I just can’t justify spending over $100 on a watch in general. I’m 100% okay with quartz, because it works better (except in a zombie apocalypse, when the amount of cardio you get is going to provide eternal power for the watch), and I’m not really concerned with the cachet that comes with a mechanical movement. A watch is almost purely an accessory for me, with very little function, so I’m damned sure not going to pay more for it than my shoes (hell, excluding my shoes, $125 is more than I spent on all of my clothes combined today).

  41. bryclops says

    May 22, 2014 at 1:34 PM

    It takes five minutes to change a battery, and you only have to do it once every three years or so. IMO, a lot of people give too much weight to the “no battery changes EVAR!” argument in favor of solar and mechanical watches.

  42. ARP says

    May 23, 2014 at 8:06 AM

    I think that’s true in an ideal world But, would you wear a nice fitting polo if it had a target logo on the chest instead of something else (or nothing)? Most of the stuff the site promotes is fine precisely because there’s no logos, it’s just a polo or suit or pants that fits well. But adding logo or brands adds complications.

  43. bjs314 says

    May 23, 2014 at 5:46 PM

    Your entire wardrobe costs less than $125 and you’re on a menswear site. :-/

  44. bjs314 says

    May 23, 2014 at 5:48 PM

    (1) It’s not a real chronograph. You can’t set the seconds hand. (2) This faux thing is why Fossil are so universally treated as garbage. It would have cost them $.75 more per watch at their volume to make an actual chronograph.

  45. jdw says

    May 23, 2014 at 6:19 PM

    …I meant all of the clothes that I was wearing. Thus the “today.” Unless you were criticizing the idea that my clothes for a given day were less than $125 combined, sans shoes? That would just be silly — it was in the lower 70s and sunny yesterday. I wore Levi’s and a Henley from Target. Tough to top $125 with that outfit.

  46. Sofia Caden says

    May 23, 2014 at 6:31 PM

    t was a gift from my Cousin, the look is so very classy and elegant. I have already got a lot of compliments on the same and I hope will get more!! 🙂 http://bit.ly/1gY5kQp

  47. Wang Yifei says

    May 25, 2014 at 3:26 AM

    It’s sold at 92.99 on Amazon. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00HG09CS8/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=A3EWZRZ6NN9VVA

  48. Christopher Teague says

    May 25, 2014 at 4:20 AM

    It’s a poor man’s Shinola! I like it but generally wouldn’t consider a quartz for over $100

  49. Joe says

    May 25, 2014 at 10:44 AM

    Nice! They didn’t have any at post time. Good to see that Amazon is fulfilling as well. Makes returns that much easier.

Men’s Fashion or Affordable Style?

Men's Fashion or Affordable Style?

Fashion is temporary and expensive. Style is timeless and affordable. Dappered® helps you work the retail system so that you can be comfortable, look sharp, and save money.

Want to share a great product? Email Us.
Continue the discussion at Dappered Threads.
For a fit perspective, see Joe's measurements.
Make sure to read our affiliate disclosure.

Connect with Dappered

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Most Popular on Dappered

  • Cheap Tech Pants, Target’s Furniture Sale, & More – The Thurs. Men’s Sales Handful
  • Monday Men’s Sales Tripod – Crisp Spring Joggers, Extra 25% off Nordy Rack Clearance, & more
  • Steal Alert: The new Clarks Bushacre 3 for under $40
  • The Best in Affordable Style from the Month that Was – March 2021
  • Steal Alert and in Review: J. Crew’s new Suede boots in Navy or Snuff for $85 ($278)
  • Steal Alert: The Tissot Heritage Visodate at Nordstrom Rack

Popular Topics

  • Best dress shirts to own
  • Best looking watches under $100
  • Best men’s dress shoes under $200
  • Nike Killshot sneaker alternatives
  • How to wear a suit without a tie
  • Suitsupply store review
  • Suitsupply Blue Line review
  • J. Crew Factory Thompson suit review
  • How much does it cost to tailor a suit?
  • Dopp kit essentials
  • Brown shoes with gray pants
  • Men’s style buying guide

RSS Latest on Dappered Threads

  • Persol 714
  • Spier and Mackay Sweatshirts for 2021
  • Tuxedo
  • How do you dress when doing yard work?
  • Looking for Military/Field Shirt

Copyright © 2021 Dappered.com | Dappered, LLC | Dappered® is a registered trademark of Dappered, LLC

Hat tip: Magazine Pro Theme On Genesis Framework

Dappered does not collect or sell its users personal information | Disclosures: Privacy and Affiliates, Gilt.com, FTC

WPE

We work with partners that use cookies to understand how visitors use our site. Find out more.